3.1. Effect of Nb-addition on GFA and thermal stabilityFigure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the as-melt spun ribbons. It can be seen that the curves for x = 3, 5, 7 all exhibit only one broad peak at 45°, indicating that each has a typical FeNi based amorphous structure. For the ribbon with x = 1, the XRD curve exhibits a sharp peak together with a broad peak, which suggests partial crystallization in the form of (Fe,Ni)23B6 with the Cr23C6 prototype structure. The Nb is a large radius atom which can enhance the atomic density of the whole alloy, and could result in the enhancement of the stability of the undercooled liquid and suppress the atomic rearrangement for the process of crystallization reaction. It clearly demonstrates that the GFA of the alloys is improved with the addition of Nb. Table 1 shows the actual atomic percentage of the alloy, determined by ICP. The result suggests that the examined composition of the ribbon is close to the nominal composition.
Table 1.
Table 1.
Table 1.
Actual atomic percentage of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt spun ribbons.
.
Nominal compositions |
Actual atomic percentage of each element/at.% |
|
Fe |
Ni |
B |
Cu |
Nb |
(Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)99Nb1 |
38.49 |
42.24 |
17.62 |
0.99 |
0.63 |
(Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 |
39.12 |
40.08 |
17.15 |
0.99 |
2.6 |
(Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)95Nb5 |
37.28 |
39.88 |
17.05 |
1.02 |
4.7 |
(Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)93Nb7 |
37.31 |
38.59 |
16.56 |
1.00 |
6.5 |
| Table 1.
Actual atomic percentage of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt spun ribbons.
. |
Figure 2 shows the DSC curves of the as-melt spun ribbons. Two obvious exothermic peaks corresponding to two different crystallization processes can be seen in all the DSC curves. To further determine the crystallization behavior, we select (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons for being pre-annealed at 653 K, 713 K, and 753 K. The XRD results in Fig. 3 show that the (Fe,Ni)23B6 precipitates prior to γ-(Fe, Ni) phase. Therefore, we can determine that the first exothermic peak of DSC,
, the sharp peak on the broad peak of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)99Nb1 XRD pattern, is believed to result from the formation of (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase, while the second peak is believed to be due to the formation of γ (Fe, Ni) phase. The first crystallization temperature (
and the second crystallization temperature (
obtained from Fig. 2 are listed in Table 2. Clearly, with the increase of Nb content,
increases from 696 K to 754 K and
increases from 712 K to 829 K. As a result, the corresponding
increases from 16 K to 75 K, indicating that with the increase of Nb content, the thermal stability of the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx ribbons is gradually improved. The effect of Nb element on the onset crystallization temperature of the secondary crystalline phase is stronger than that of the first crystalline phase, which results in the gradual increase of
. Meanwhile, with the increase of Nb content, the exothermic peak width of the secondary crystalline phase increases gradually, indicating that the precipitation process of the γ (Fe, Ni) phase is sensitive to Nb. This may be due to the enhancement of L-S percolating network structure with the increase of Nb, leading to a higher degree of dense and randomly packed atomic configuration.[20,21] Therefore, the diffusion process of atoms becomes more difficult and further affects the crystallization process.
Table 2.
Table 2.
| Table 2.
Thermal stabilities of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt spun ribbons
. |
3.3. Effect of annealing on crystallization process and magnetic propertiesFigure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons annealed at 809 K for different times. It is found that the primary phase is (Fe,Ni)23B6 which precipitates in a very short annealing time of 10 s, followed by the occurrence of FCC γ (Fe, Ni) phase at 0.5 min and then further growing with annealing time increasing. Firstly, the atomic radius of Fe is similar to that of Ni, so that there is a competitive relationship between the formation of γ (Fe, Ni) phase and that of α-Fe phase in the annealing process. On the other hand, the thermal stability of α-Fe phase at high temperature is lower than that of γ (Fe, Ni) phase, so that γ (Fe, Ni) phase prefers to precipitate from an amorphous matrix.[26,27] In contrast, the enthalpy as well as the stability of (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase increases with high Ni content increasing. The short annealing time for the formation of (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase is probably attributed to its instantaneous crystallization process without substantial rearrangement of constituent atoms over longer distance.[28] On the other hand, due to the non-solubility of B in γ-(Fe, Ni) phase, the residual amorphous phase surrounding γ (Fe, Ni) is enriched with B increasing and forms a barrier inhibiting γ (Fe, Ni) phase for further growth, leading to a longer crystallization time than the (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase.[14,29]
The values of crystallization activation energy E1 ((Fe,Ni)23B6) and E2 (γ-(Fe, Ni)) for the first 2 exothermic peaks of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons are calculated by both Kissinger equation and Ozava equation and the results are listed in Table 4. Clearly, the value of E2 is larger than that of E1, which further confirms the time required for the precipitation of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase is longer than that of the (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase.
Table 4.
Table 4.
Table 4.
Crystallization activation energy of as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons.
.
Method |
|
|
Kissinger |
259.67 |
437.65 |
Ozava |
258.38 |
428.39 |
| Table 4.
Crystallization activation energy of as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons.
. |
In order to further investigate the effect of grain size on soft magnetic properties, the average grain size of (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase and γ (Fe, Ni) phase for the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons are estimated by using Scherrerʼs equation and the results are shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the grain size of (Fe, Ni)23B6 increases from 33 nm to 38 nm with annealing time increasing from 10 s to 0.5 min and then remains almost unchanged with further annealing while the grain size for γ (Fe, Ni) keeps increasing from 10 nm to 80 nm as annealing time rises, indicating the precipitation of γ (Fe, Ni) can restrain the growth of (Fe, Ni)23B6, which is confirmed by the corresponding peak intensity in the XRD patterns in Fig. 6.
Figure 8 shows the changes of Hc and Hs with annealing time for the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon. It is found that as the annealing time increases, Hc exhibits an obvious upward trend and eventually reaches to ∼42.2 A/m. As indicated in the results of Hernando model, soft magnetic properties depend strongly on the nature of the nanocrystal + amorphous+nanocrystal coupling. The increase of Hc after annealing the ribbon for 1 min is attributed to weak intergranular exchange due to the fact that amorphous phases are converted into (Fe, Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni), while the internal stress has not yet been completely released. When the annealing time increases to 15 min, the internal stress σ disappears, which leads to a slight decrease in Hc.[30,31] However, the gradual growth of (Fe, Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni) grains cause Hc to rise, thus deteriorating the soft magnetic properties. Compared with other FeNi-based alloys,[32–34] despite lacking α-Fe phase due to the low stability of α -Fe phase in high Ni content FeNi-based alloys, the ribbon still exhibits a relatively low coercivity due to the absence of hard magnetic phases Fe2B and Fe3B. Moreover, Ms is low in the early stage of annealing, which is due to the low volume fraction of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase. However, with further annealing, both (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase and γ-(Fe, Ni) phase are precipitated from the amorphous phase, leading to the increase of Ms and then remaining nearly constant at
after being annealed for 0.5 min. As Ms is an insensitive parameter, its value is independent of size, distribution and morphology of grains, so Ms maintains a stable value.
Figure 9 shows the high resolution transmission electron micrograph and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the as-melt spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon. Clearly, the homogeneous amorphous structure is consistent with the XRD pattern. The TEM image in Fig. 10(a) shows that the ribbon is nearly full of nano grains (∼40 nm on average) in contact with each other with a little amorphous phase, which is consistent with the XRD patterns as shown in Fig. 6. In such a case, the ferromagnetic exchange reaction is greatly enhanced which explains that the coercivity remains at a relative low value though there are no ferromagnetic nanocrystallites like α-Fe. Moreover, the three diffraction rings corresponding to the crystalline structures of (Fe, Ni)23B6 are indexed by planes (422) and (531), and γ-(Fe, Ni) phase is indexed by plane (111). In addition, the detailed analysis of the interplanar fringes of the nanograins confirms the fcc-FeNi structure with the (111) spacing of 0.208 nm in Fig. 10(b) and (Fe, Ni)23B6 with the (420) spacing of 0.235 nm in Fig. 10(c).