Thermal stability, crystallization, and magnetic properties of FeNiBCuNb alloys
Chen Zhe1, Zhu Qian-Ke1, Zhang Shu-Ling2, Zhang Ke-Wei1, †, Jiang Yong1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
School of Material of Science and Engineering, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: drzkw@126.com

Abstract

Amorphous (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) ribbons are prepared by using the melt-spinning method. We find that the glass forming ability (GFA) of the as-melt spun ribbons is significantly improved by adding Nb element. In addition, the thermal stability evaluated in steps of effectively increases from 16 K to 75 K with Nb content increasing. The as-melt spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon exhibits a lowest coercivity of 2 A/m and relatively large saturation magnetization of and thus it can be further treated by being annealed at 809 K. The crystallization behavior is confirmed to be determined by two individual crystallization processes corresponding to the precipitation of (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase and γ-(Fe,Ni) phase. With increasing annealing time, the single (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase can be transformed into a mixture of (Fe,Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe,Ni) phase, and the grain size of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase increases from 5 nm to 80 nm while the grain size of (Fe,Ni)23B6 remains almost unchanged. Finally, we find that the grain growth in each of (Fe,Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni) deteriorates the overall magnetic properties.

1. Introduction

FeNi based nanocrystalline alloys have shown great potential applications in power electronics due to the advantages of high thermodynamic stability, high glass forming ability (GFA) and good soft magnetic properties.[16] In general, nanocrystalline magnetic alloys are obtained by being annealed on magnetic amorphous alloys because proper annealing can relieve the internal stress of the as-melt spun amorphous alloy.[7] Also, after annealing the alloy, the ferromagnetic exchange reaction between soft magnetic nanocrystallites can average out the magnetocrystalline anisotropy and improve the soft magnetic properties if the size and distribution of the nanocrystallites are well controlled.[810]

Besides, substitution or addition of insoluble elements such as Cu can act as heterogeneous nucleation sites to facilitate the precipitation of primary crystalline phase. Large atoms such as Nb, Ta, W, and Cr can serve as inhibitors to prevent the grain from growing which is beneficial for improving the soft magnetic properties and glass forming ability (GFA).[1115] Previous study has suggested that the order of ability to substitute elements in refining grain size of Fe–M–Cu–Si–B alloys is . Therefore, we select Nb as the additive in this study.[16] On the other hand, the hard magnetic phases like Fe2B and Fe3B with high magnetocrystalline anisotropy would provide a great hindrance to the domain wall movement and lead to an increase in coercivity.[17] Therefore, inhibiting the precipitation of hard magnetic phases is also an effective way to improve the soft magnetic properties. It was reported that the coercivity for Fe/Ni=1 is the lowest due to the hard phase disappearing after being annealed.[1]

In this work, Nb is added into the Fe40Ni40B19Cu1 system, and the effect of Nb content on the thermal stability and the influence of annealing conditions on the crystallization process, microstructures and the magnetic properties of Fe–Ni–B–Cu–Nb alloys are investigated.

2. Experiment

Master alloys with nominal compositions of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) were prepared by induction melting the mixtures of high-purity elements (Fe:99.99 at.%, Ni:99.99 at.%, B:99.99 at.%, Cu:99.99 at.%, Nb:99.97 at.%,) under an argon atmosphere. The alloys were melted three or four times to achieve homogenization. Then, the master alloys were fabricated in the form of ribbons with about 2 mm in width and in thickness, by using a standard procedure of rapid quenching of the melt on a rotating disc (melt-spinning method) with a surface speed of 28.8 m/s. The actual chemical compositions were checked by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP) after melt-spinning process. Differential scanning calorimetry (NETZSCH-DSC 214) measurements were carried out in a stream of helium with a constant heating rate of 15 K/min in a temperature range from room temperature to 923 K. High-temperature microscope (HiTOS-DC) was used to anneal the as-melt spun ribbons at 809 K for different times (10 s, 0.5 min, 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min). The melt-spun ribbons were annealed by using a rapid thermal process (RTP) in a vacuum below 6 ×10−3 Pa at a heating rate of 200 K/min and argon was introduced as a protective gas to prevent the ribbons from oxidizing.[18,19] The x-ray diffraction (PANalytical X, Pert Power) with Cu radiation ( Å) was used to identify the structures of as-melt spun and annealed samples. The magnetization (Ms) and coercivity (Hc) were measured with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Versalab) and an auto test system of magnetic materials (MATS-2010SD) respectively. The samples for TEM, cut from amorphous ribbons, were thinned after heat treatment by ion beam milling. The transmission electronic microscopy (TEM, JEM 2100F) was performed for the observation of microstructure.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Effect of Nb-addition on GFA and thermal stability

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the as-melt spun ribbons. It can be seen that the curves for x = 3, 5, 7 all exhibit only one broad peak at 45°, indicating that each has a typical FeNi based amorphous structure. For the ribbon with x = 1, the XRD curve exhibits a sharp peak together with a broad peak, which suggests partial crystallization in the form of (Fe,Ni)23B6 with the Cr23C6 prototype structure. The Nb is a large radius atom which can enhance the atomic density of the whole alloy, and could result in the enhancement of the stability of the undercooled liquid and suppress the atomic rearrangement for the process of crystallization reaction. It clearly demonstrates that the GFA of the alloys is improved with the addition of Nb. Table 1 shows the actual atomic percentage of the alloy, determined by ICP. The result suggests that the examined composition of the ribbon is close to the nominal composition.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100Nbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt-spun ribbons.
Table 1.

Actual atomic percentage of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt spun ribbons.

.

Figure 2 shows the DSC curves of the as-melt spun ribbons. Two obvious exothermic peaks corresponding to two different crystallization processes can be seen in all the DSC curves. To further determine the crystallization behavior, we select (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons for being pre-annealed at 653 K, 713 K, and 753 K. The XRD results in Fig. 3 show that the (Fe,Ni)23B6 precipitates prior to γ-(Fe, Ni) phase. Therefore, we can determine that the first exothermic peak of DSC, , the sharp peak on the broad peak of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)99Nb1 XRD pattern, is believed to result from the formation of (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase, while the second peak is believed to be due to the formation of γ (Fe, Ni) phase. The first crystallization temperature ( and the second crystallization temperature ( obtained from Fig. 2 are listed in Table 2. Clearly, with the increase of Nb content, increases from 696 K to 754 K and increases from 712 K to 829 K. As a result, the corresponding increases from 16 K to 75 K, indicating that with the increase of Nb content, the thermal stability of the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx ribbons is gradually improved. The effect of Nb element on the onset crystallization temperature of the secondary crystalline phase is stronger than that of the first crystalline phase, which results in the gradual increase of . Meanwhile, with the increase of Nb content, the exothermic peak width of the secondary crystalline phase increases gradually, indicating that the precipitation process of the γ (Fe, Ni) phase is sensitive to Nb. This may be due to the enhancement of L-S percolating network structure with the increase of Nb, leading to a higher degree of dense and randomly packed atomic configuration.[20,21] Therefore, the diffusion process of atoms becomes more difficult and further affects the crystallization process.

Fig. 2. DSC curves of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100−xNbx (x = 1,3,5,7) as-melt spun ribbons.
Fig. 3. XRD patterns of as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons annealed at different temperatures.
Table 2.

Thermal stabilities of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) as-melt spun ribbons

.
3.2. Effect of Nb-addition on magnetic property

Figure 4 shows the plots of saturation magnetization (Ms) versus coercivity (Hc) of the as-melt spun ribbons with different Nb content. The specific values of Ms and Hc are summarized in Fig. 5. The lowest Hc of 2 A/m for x = 3 is obtained. Moreover, the Ms decreases monotonically from to with Nb content increasing from x = 1 to x = 7. It is well known that the saturation magnetization (Ms) reflects the quantity of total magnetic moment. According to the energy band theory, increasing Nb content means that the concentration of Fe and Ni decrease, thereby leading the total atomic magnetic moment to decrease, and resulting in the decline of Ms. The Hc is known as a structure-sensitive quantity, and it is linked to the internal stress, the relaxation and the local structure. The Hc is relatively high with x = 1. The reason may be that the low volume fraction of crystalline phase produced pinning effect hinders the movement of magnetic domains. Table 3 lists the values of Hc and Bs (or Ms) for the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 alloy and some related alloys. Compared with other FeNi magnetic alloys, the as-melt spun ribbon with 3 at.% Nb exhibits excellent soft magnetic properties. It has a relatively low coercivity of 2 A/m and large saturation magnetization of . Therefore, considering the minimum Hc and relatively high Ms, the ribbon with x = 3 is annealed for further research.

Fig. 4. Saturation magnetization (Ms) versus coercivity (Hc) of as-melt spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) ribbons.
Fig. 5. Saturation magnetization (Ms) and coercivity (Hc) versus Nb content for (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) alloy.
Table 3.

Values of Hc and Bs (or Is) of FeNi magnetic alloys.

.
3.3. Effect of annealing on crystallization process and magnetic properties

Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons annealed at 809 K for different times. It is found that the primary phase is (Fe,Ni)23B6 which precipitates in a very short annealing time of 10 s, followed by the occurrence of FCC γ (Fe, Ni) phase at 0.5 min and then further growing with annealing time increasing. Firstly, the atomic radius of Fe is similar to that of Ni, so that there is a competitive relationship between the formation of γ (Fe, Ni) phase and that of α-Fe phase in the annealing process. On the other hand, the thermal stability of α-Fe phase at high temperature is lower than that of γ (Fe, Ni) phase, so that γ (Fe, Ni) phase prefers to precipitate from an amorphous matrix.[26,27] In contrast, the enthalpy as well as the stability of (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase increases with high Ni content increasing. The short annealing time for the formation of (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase is probably attributed to its instantaneous crystallization process without substantial rearrangement of constituent atoms over longer distance.[28] On the other hand, due to the non-solubility of B in γ-(Fe, Ni) phase, the residual amorphous phase surrounding γ (Fe, Ni) is enriched with B increasing and forms a barrier inhibiting γ (Fe, Ni) phase for further growth, leading to a longer crystallization time than the (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase.[14,29]

Fig. 6. XRD patterns of as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons annealed at 809 K for different times.

The values of crystallization activation energy E1 ((Fe,Ni)23B6) and E2 (γ-(Fe, Ni)) for the first 2 exothermic peaks of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons are calculated by both Kissinger equation and Ozava equation and the results are listed in Table 4. Clearly, the value of E2 is larger than that of E1, which further confirms the time required for the precipitation of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase is longer than that of the (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase.

Table 4.

Crystallization activation energy of as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons.

.

In order to further investigate the effect of grain size on soft magnetic properties, the average grain size of (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase and γ (Fe, Ni) phase for the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbons are estimated by using Scherrerʼs equation and the results are shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the grain size of (Fe, Ni)23B6 increases from 33 nm to 38 nm with annealing time increasing from 10 s to 0.5 min and then remains almost unchanged with further annealing while the grain size for γ (Fe, Ni) keeps increasing from 10 nm to 80 nm as annealing time rises, indicating the precipitation of γ (Fe, Ni) can restrain the growth of (Fe, Ni)23B6, which is confirmed by the corresponding peak intensity in the XRD patterns in Fig. 6.

Fig. 7. Dependence of grain size of (Fe, Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni) on annealing time in (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon at 809 K.

Figure 8 shows the changes of Hc and Hs with annealing time for the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon. It is found that as the annealing time increases, Hc exhibits an obvious upward trend and eventually reaches to ∼42.2 A/m. As indicated in the results of Hernando model, soft magnetic properties depend strongly on the nature of the nanocrystal + amorphous+nanocrystal coupling. The increase of Hc after annealing the ribbon for 1 min is attributed to weak intergranular exchange due to the fact that amorphous phases are converted into (Fe, Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni), while the internal stress has not yet been completely released. When the annealing time increases to 15 min, the internal stress σ disappears, which leads to a slight decrease in Hc.[30,31] However, the gradual growth of (Fe, Ni)23B6 and γ-(Fe, Ni) grains cause Hc to rise, thus deteriorating the soft magnetic properties. Compared with other FeNi-based alloys,[3234] despite lacking α-Fe phase due to the low stability of α -Fe phase in high Ni content FeNi-based alloys, the ribbon still exhibits a relatively low coercivity due to the absence of hard magnetic phases Fe2B and Fe3B. Moreover, Ms is low in the early stage of annealing, which is due to the low volume fraction of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase. However, with further annealing, both (Fe, Ni)23B6 phase and γ-(Fe, Ni) phase are precipitated from the amorphous phase, leading to the increase of Ms and then remaining nearly constant at after being annealed for 0.5 min. As Ms is an insensitive parameter, its value is independent of size, distribution and morphology of grains, so Ms maintains a stable value.

Fig. 8. Dependence of Hc and Ms on annealing time for (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon at 809 K.

Figure 9 shows the high resolution transmission electron micrograph and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the as-melt spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon. Clearly, the homogeneous amorphous structure is consistent with the XRD pattern. The TEM image in Fig. 10(a) shows that the ribbon is nearly full of nano grains (∼40 nm on average) in contact with each other with a little amorphous phase, which is consistent with the XRD patterns as shown in Fig. 6. In such a case, the ferromagnetic exchange reaction is greatly enhanced which explains that the coercivity remains at a relative low value though there are no ferromagnetic nanocrystallites like α-Fe. Moreover, the three diffraction rings corresponding to the crystalline structures of (Fe, Ni)23B6 are indexed by planes (422) and (531), and γ-(Fe, Ni) phase is indexed by plane (111). In addition, the detailed analysis of the interplanar fringes of the nanograins confirms the fcc-FeNi structure with the (111) spacing of 0.208 nm in Fig. 10(b) and (Fe, Ni)23B6 with the (420) spacing of 0.235 nm in Fig. 10(c).

Fig. 9. (a) TEM bright field image and (b) SAED pattern for as-melt-spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon.
Fig. 10. (a) TEM bright field images, SAED patterns, and grain size distribution for (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon after being annealed at 809 K for 0.5 min. (b) and (c) HREM of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon after being annealed at 809 K for 0.5 min with marking different interplanar spacing values.
4. Conclusions

In this work, we investigate the effects of Nb addition on glass forming ability and thermal stability of as-melt spun (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) ribbons, and the effect of annealing time on the magnetic properties of the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon. Several conclusions are drawn below.

(i) With the addition of Nb element, the GFA and thermal stability of (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)100-−xNbx (x = 1, 3, 5, 7) ribbons are greatly improved.

(ii) The as-melt spun ribbon with 3 at.% Nb exhibits a lowest coercivity of 2 A/m and relatively large saturation magnetization of .

(iii) (Fe,Ni)23B6 phase is first precipitated in the (Fe40Ni40B19Cu1)97Nb3 ribbon when annealed at 809 K for 10 s followed by the formation and growth of γ-(Fe, Ni) phase with the longer annealing time.

(iv) With the further increase of annealing time, the growth of (Fe,Ni)23B6 grain and γ-(Fe, Ni) grain degrades the overall magnetic properties.

Reference
[1] Vlasak G Svec P Kuzminski M Slawska-Waniewska A Butvinova B Butvina P Hosko J 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 S64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.106
[2] Milica M Vasić Vladimir A Blagojević Nebojša N Begović A 2015 Thermochim Acta 614 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2015.06.015
[3] Minić D G Blagojević V A Mihajlović L E Cosović V R Minic’D M 2011 Thermochim Acta 519 83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.02.040
[4] Tavoosi M Barahimi A 2017 Surfaces & Interfaces 8 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2017.05.004
[5] Gutiérrez J Barandiarán J M MíNguez P Kaczkowski Z Ruuskanen P Vlasák G Svec P Duhaj P 2003 Sensor Actuat A-phys. 106 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00136-5
[6] Tsepelev V Starodubtsev Y Konashkov V Belozerov V 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 707 210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.345
[7] Kim C W Cho K H Suk H G 2014 Phys. Met. Metallogr. 115 1338 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X14130092
[8] Herzer G 1989 IEEE T. Magn. 25 3327 https://doi.org/10.1109/20.42292
[9] Suzki K Cadogan J M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 2730 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.2730
[10] Herzer G 1990 IEEE T Magn. 26 1397 https://doi.org/10.1109/20.104389
[11] Long Z L Chang C T Ding Y H Shao Y Zhang P Shen B L Inoue A 2008 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 354 4609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.009
[12] Inoue A Shen B L 2002 Mater. T. Jim. 43 766 https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.766
[13] Chang C T Shen B L Inoue A 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 011901 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2159107
[14] Inoue A Shen B L Chang C T 2004 Acta Mater. 52 4093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.022
[15] Kong F Shen B Makino A Inoue A 2011 Thin Solid Films 519 8280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.03.109
[16] Lu W Fan J Wang Y Yan B 2010 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322 2935 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.05.008
[17] Yan Z J Bian B R Hu Y Dang S E Xia L T Wang Y M 2010 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322 3359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.027
[18] Wang H Ng S M Wong H F Wong W C Lam K K Liu Y K Fei L F Zhou Y B Mak C L Wang Y Leung C W 2018 Vacuum 152 239 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.03.024
[19] Galesic I Reusch U Angelkort C Lewalter H Berendes A Schweda E Kolbesen B O 2001 Vacuum 61 479 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(01)00152-X
[20] Wu Y Hui X D Lu Z P Liu Z Y Liang L Chen G L 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 467 187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.002
[21] Poon S J Shiflet G J Guo F Q Ponnambalam V 2003 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 317 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(02)02000-8
[22] He K Y Zhao Y H Li G G Cheng L Z Wu B Sui M L Chen W Z 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316 34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.193
[23] Ling Z Ma X H Li Q Zhang J J Dong Y Q Chang C T 2014 J. Alloys Compd. 608 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.114
[24] Wang A D Zhang M G Zhang J H Men H Shen B L Pang S J Zhang T 2012 J. Alloys Compd. 536 S354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.028
[25] Hwang J Y Lee H S Yi S H 2018 Met. Mater-Int. 25 1
[26] Agudo P Vazquez M 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 6044
[27] Elbaile L Crespo R D Pierna A R García J A 2008 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 354 5143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.108
[28] Švec P Turčanová J Janičkovič D Škorvánek I Švec P Sr. 2009 The 13th International Conference on Rapidly Quenched and Metastable Materials 24–29 August, 2008 Dresden, Germany 012092
[29] Glezer A M Gorshenkov M V Zhukov D G Korchuganova O A Aleev A A Torben Boll Shurygina N A Shchetinin I V 2015 Mater. Lett. 160 339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.153
[30] Hernando A Vázquez M Kulik T Prados C 1995 J. Phys.-Condens Matter 51 3581 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.3581
[31] Hernando A Navarro I I Gorría P 1995 J. Phys.-Condens Matter 51 3281 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.3281
[32] Saiseng S Winotai P Nilpairuch S 2004 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 278 172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.404
[33] Liu Y J Chang I T H 2002 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 325 25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01413-7
[34] Sui M L Qian L H He K Y 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 286 201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00714-0